[debbugs-tracker] bug#26123: closed (guile-2.2.0: AI_ADDRCONFIG)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:50:18 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#26123: guile-2.2.0: AI_ADDRCONFIG
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26123,
regarding guile-2.2.0: AI_ADDRCONFIG
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
26123: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26123
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> guile-2.2.0: AI_ADDRCONFIG
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:29:18 +0100
>
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
> When compiling guile-2.2.0 on NetBSD_7.99.65/amd64, I see:
>
>
>   SNARF  net_db.doc
> net_db.c:468:***Missing or erroneous `#define FUNC_NAME s_AI_ADDRCONFIG);'
> net_db.c:488:***Missing or erroneous #undef for AI_ADDRCONFIG);:
>
> Compilation continues even though this looks like an error.
>  Thomas
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#26123: guile-2.2.0: AI_ADDRCONFIG
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:50:18 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> On Fri 17 Mar 2017 14:11, <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > ---- Thomas Klausner <address@hidden> wrote: 
> >> 
> >>   SNARF  net_db.doc
> >> net_db.c:468:***Missing or erroneous `#define FUNC_NAME s_AI_ADDRCONFIG);'
> >> net_db.c:488:***Missing or erroneous #undef for AI_ADDRCONFIG);:
> >> 
> >> Compilation continues even though this looks like an error.
> >
> > Yeah,  while annoying, this is harmless.
> >
> > The proper fix in my opinion is to limit the regular expression on line
> > 28 in libguile/guile-func-name-check to only match function definition
> > macros.  Currently, it matches other macros that define things other
> > than functions, and so erroneously looks for a function body.
> >
> > For example, adding a space like /^SCM_DEFINE / would probably be 
> > appropriate.  However, that would prevent it from matching any other function 
> > defining macros, if they exist.
>
> Good idea, done.  Thanks :)
>
> ANdy
>
>
> --- End Message ---