[debbugs-tracker] bug#26379: closed (patch for display.texi)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:42:44 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26379,
regarding patch for display.texi
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
26379: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26379
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: patch for display.texi Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900

My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated.
For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a long time.
So having it in Info is very useful.  Thus I want to send a patch for 
display.texi
to infer line-pixel-height.

However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is really 
useful.

display.texi.patch
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#26379: patch for display.texi
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:42:44 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > From: Tak Kunihiro <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:37:05 +0900
> > Cc: Kunihiro Tak <address@hidden>
> > 
> > My entry point is Info and sometime I think Info needs to be updated.
> > For example, I could not notice existence of line-pixel-height for a long 
> > time.
> > So having it in Info is very useful.  Thus I want to send a patch for 
> > display.texi
> > to infer line-pixel-height.
>
> Thanks, I used a slightly different wording and added it in a
> different node.  Pushed to the emacs-25 branch.
>
> > However, at the same time, I wonder if sending this kind of patch is really 
> > useful.
>
> Why not?
>
>
> --- End Message ---