[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[debbugs-tracker] bug#14347: closed (reset, shift, continuation values t
From: |
GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: |
[debbugs-tracker] bug#14347: closed (reset, shift, continuation values truncated inconsistently) |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:08:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:06:59 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#14347: reset, shift, continuation values truncated
inconsistently
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14347,
regarding reset, shift, continuation values truncated inconsistently
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)
--
14347: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14347
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
reset, shift, continuation values truncated inconsistently |
Date: |
04 May 2013 10:47:15 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Hi, the following seems at least inconsistent to
me and possibly unintended: I believe it
demonstrates that the continuation captured by
`shift' passes all its values to its continuation
when it's called directly, but truncates them to
the first value when it's bound to a variable
outside the reset expression and then called.
The documentation for reset and shift in the
manual does not quite say, but I believe the
captured continuation in these examples should be
the continuation of the shift expression inside
the reset expression, that is, it should simply
return the three values in all cases.
GNU Guile 2.0.5-deb+1-3
Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
...
Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (ice-9 control))
scheme@(guile-user)> (reset (shift k (k)) (values 3.1 2 3))
$1 = 3.1
$2 = 2
$3 = 3
scheme@(guile-user)> ((reset (shift k k) (values 3.1 2 3)))
$4 = 3.1
$5 = 2
$6 = 3
scheme@(guile-user)> (let ((k (reset (shift k k) (values 3.1 2 3)))) (k))
$7 = 3.1
scheme@(guile-user)> (define k (reset (shift k k) (values 3.1 2 3)))
scheme@(guile-user)> (k)
$8 = 3.1
scheme@(guile-user)> (k)
$9 = 3.1
(I installed guile-2.0 with apt-get on Ubuntu and got this.)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#14347: reset, shift, continuation values truncated inconsistently |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:06:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat 04 May 2013 09:47, Jussi Piitulainen <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi, the following seems at least inconsistent to
> me and possibly unintended: I believe it
> demonstrates that the continuation captured by
> `shift' passes all its values to its continuation
> when it's called directly, but truncates them to
> the first value when it's bound to a variable
> outside the reset expression and then called.
Thank you for the report, and apologies for taking so long to fix it!
Fixed in a192c336a22b8c9ac354e88c2f2b317dff22b8c9 on stable-2.0. 2.1.3
already had it fixed, but by accident.
Andy
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [debbugs-tracker] bug#14347: closed (reset, shift, continuation values truncated inconsistently),
GNU bug Tracking System <=