emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#14480: closed ([PATCH] A few error to user-error r


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#14480: closed ([PATCH] A few error to user-error replacements)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:35:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:34:35 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#14480: [PATCH] A few error to user-error replacements
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14480,
regarding [PATCH] A few error to user-error replacements
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
14480: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14480
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] A few error to user-error replacements Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 18:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
I put (setq debug-on-error t) in my init.el recently and started hitting some 
of these.
Patch attached.
There are over 8000 occurrences "(error" in emacs-24.3/lisp and subdirs, 
probably a lot that should be replaced; should we report them every time we hit 
new ones or maybe queue for a few months to avoid spamming the bug db?

Attachment: user-error.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#14480: [PATCH] A few error to user-error replacements Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:34:35 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Thanks for the user-error patches, but as you know we can't use them
without a copyright assignment. Since we are aware that it is desirable
to replace error by user-eror where applicable, I don't think it is
necessary to keep this bug report open.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]