|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#15761: closed (Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List*) |
Date: | Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:39:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:38:50 -0400 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15761, regarding Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 15761: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15761 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:48 -0400 Forwarding from emacs-devel in order to get a bug number.---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alin Soare <address@hidden>
Date: Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:55 AM
Subject: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List*
To: address@hiddenWhen I mark a buffer for saving (S marker in the 3rd column), the unmark does not clean the flag.This happens because the unmark does simply so:(tabulated-list-set-col 0 " " t)and the "S" marker is on the 3rd column, and it's not cleared.Now I discovered that in fact "Unmark" command should be called "unmark the deletion".Info page, 19.5 Operating on Several Buffers, quote:`u'Remove all flags from the current line, and move down(`Buffer-menu-unmark').This is not true. Either press "g" to revert the buffer, or re-define "Buffer-menu-unmark" to really unmark the buffers.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:38:50 -0400 Fixed in r114874.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |