emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#12454: closed (24.2; GNU Emacs manual: Reference t


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#12454: closed (24.2; GNU Emacs manual: Reference to invalid variable gdb-use-separate-io-buffer)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 03:26:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:24:34 +0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12454: 24.2; GNU Emacs manual: Reference to invalid 
variable gdb-use-separate-io-buffer
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12454,
regarding 24.2; GNU Emacs manual: Reference to invalid variable 
gdb-use-separate-io-buffer
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12454: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12454
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.2; GNU Emacs manual: Reference to invalid variable gdb-use-separate-io-buffer Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:53:04 +0530
Quoting section '27.6.5.1 GDB User Interface Layout' from the GNU Emacs
manual (accompanying Emacs version 24.2),

"However, if `gdb-use-separate-io-buffer' is `nil', the I/O buffer
does not appear and the primary source buffer occupies the full width
of the frame."

The variable gdb-user-separate-io-buffer no longer exists.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#12454: 24.2; GNU Emacs manual: Reference to invalid variable gdb-use-separate-io-buffer Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:24:34 +0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)
chandan r <address@hidden> writes:

> Quoting section '27.6.5.1 GDB User Interface Layout' from the GNU Emacs
> manual (accompanying Emacs version 24.2),
>
> "However, if `gdb-use-separate-io-buffer' is `nil', the I/O buffer
> does not appear and the primary source buffer occupies the full width
> of the frame."
>
> The variable gdb-user-separate-io-buffer no longer exists.

Fixed, thanks.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]