emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#12441: closed (24.2.50; emacs-bzr-version is not r


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#12441: closed (24.2.50; emacs-bzr-version is not reliable)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:14:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:12:30 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12441: emacs-bzr-version is not reliable
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12441,
regarding 24.2.50; emacs-bzr-version is not reliable
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12441: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12441
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.2.50; emacs-bzr-version is not reliable Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:52:22 +0200 (CEST)
The variable emacs-bzr-version gives wrong information when emacs has
been built from a revision not at the tip of the current branch.

The best demonstration of the problem is shown in the second line
below, put there by M-x report-emacs-bug:

In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.0, NS apple-appkit-1138.47)
 of 2012-09-14 on airy
Bzr revision: 110013 address@hidden

In fact, this emacs is built from a lightweight checkout of bzr
revision 109703. The automatically provided information above seems to
be taken from the emacs-bzr-version variable, which is wrong, in other
words.

Windowing system distributor `Apple', version 10.3.1138
Configured using:
 `configure '--with-ns''

- Harald



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#12441: emacs-bzr-version is not reliable Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:12:30 -0400 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Version: 24.3

Glenn Morris wrote:

> vc-bzr-find-revision should be similarly improved.

Done.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]