[debbugs-tracker] bug#12252: closed (24.2.50; OTF_get_variation_glyphs and libm17n-flt)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:45:30 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12252: 24.2.50; OTF_get_variation_glyphs and 
libm17n-flt
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12252,
regarding 24.2.50; OTF_get_variation_glyphs and libm17n-flt
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12252: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12252
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.2.50; OTF_get_variation_glyphs and libm17n-flt
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:32:08 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Hello!
>
> In Mac OS X I have installed 32-bit libotf 0.9.12 with Fink and 64-bit libotf 
> 0.9.5 with MacPorts. The latter does not have it. MacPorts also does not 
> provide libm17n-core and libm17n-flt.
>
> What do I gain with up-to-date libotf and libm17n-core/libm17n-flt?
>
> --
> Greetings
>
>   Pete
>
> People say that if you play Microsoft CD's backwards, you hear satanic things, 
> but that's nothing, because if you play them forwards, they install MS Windows.
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#12252: 24.2.50; OTF_get_variation_glyphs and libm17n-flt
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:45:30 -0400
>
>
>
>
> tags 12252 notabug
> stop
>
> Peter Dyballa wrote (on Tue, 21 Aug 2012 at 22:32 +0200):
>
> > What do I gain with up-to-date libotf and libm17n-core/libm17n-flt?
>
> Nothing for --with-ns builds IIUC, probably improved complex script
> support for X11 builds, as detailed in the INSTALL file.
>
> This does not seem like an Emacs bug.
>
>
> --- End Message ---