[debbugs-tracker] bug#12032: closed (quasiquote is too slow)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:57:18 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12032: quasiquote is too slow
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12032,
regarding quasiquote is too slow
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12032: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12032
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> quasiquote is too slow
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:10:47 +0800
>
>
>
>
> I think our quasiquote is too slow, here's an algorithm to test it.
> 1. quasiquote version:
> https://gist.github.com/3148984
> 2. use list append to instead
> https://gist.github.com/3148977
>
> The input value is 6000.
> v1 cost ~50s for me.
> v2 ~16s.
>
> But quasiquote is more elegant I think.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#12032: quasiquote is too slow
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:57:18 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi, Nala,
>
> nalaginrut <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > Yes, Ludo, I realized that my measurement was little different:
> > -----------code---------
> > echo 6000 | ./v1.scm 1>/dev/null
> > -----------end----------
> > So I believe the delayed time caused by I/O.
> >
> > But I can't reproduce the measure data I provided now(both
> > stable-2.0/wip-rtl), since it's been a while, I guess the later Guile
> > got some promotion? And I can't remember the commit version I've tried
> > (hmm...I should provide it). 
>
> So I’m closing this bug for now.  However, feel free to reopen it, or
> open another one, if you find the problem is still there.  But please,
> make sure to reduce your benchmark as much as possible.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---