emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#11468: closed ([2.0.5] ‘%port-conversion-strategy


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#11468: closed ([2.0.5] ‘%port-conversion-strategy’ broken & undoc umented)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:59:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 00:57:01 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#11468: [2.0.5] ‘%port-conversion-strategy’ broken & 
undocumented
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11468,
regarding [2.0.5] ‘%port-conversion-strategy’ broken & undocumented
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
11468: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11468
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [2.0.5] ‘%port-conversion-strategy’ broken & undocumented Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:23:51 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux)
‘%port-conversion-strategy’ is not documented, and its relation to
‘scm_to_stringn’ is not documented either.

Worse:

  scheme@(guile-user)> (fluid-set! %port-conversion-strategy 'error)
  Segmentation fault

Indeed, an integer is expected:

  scheme@(guile-user)> (fluid-ref %port-conversion-strategy)
  $2 = 1

Fix to expect a symbol like ‘set-port-conversion-strategy!’?

Ludo’.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#11468: [2.0.5] ‘%port-conversion-strate gy’ broken & undocumented Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:57:01 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux)
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:

> ‘%port-conversion-strategy’ is not documented, and its relation to
> ‘scm_to_stringn’ is not documented either.

Fixed in commit b22e94db7c91d7661204e33f3bc2bfead002c9b7, in stable-2.0.

Comments welcome!

Thanks,
Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]