[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5567: closed (`next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:15:57 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible 
frames
has caused the GNU bug report #5567,
regarding `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
5567: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5567
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:14:36 -0800 `next-window' and related functions like `display-buffer' say in their docstrings and in the source code comments that an argument of 0 or 'visible will consider windows on visible or visible-or-iconified frames.  However, the actual behavior is to consider only frames on the current terminal.  The attached patch updates the documentation to match the behavior.

Legal note: I have a copyright assignment on file, and my employer, Google, also has a copyright assignment on file.

emacs-next-window.txt
Description: Text document

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:15:57 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> Version: 24.1
>
> Michael Shields wrote:
>
> > `next-window' and related functions like `display-buffer' say in their
> > docstrings and in the source code comments that an argument of 0 or
> > 'visible will consider windows on visible or visible-or-iconified
> > frames. However, the actual behavior is to consider only frames on the
> > current terminal. The attached patch updates the documentation to
> > match the behavior.
>
> Thank you for the patch, which is now applied. Sorry for the delay.
>
> > Legal note: I have a copyright assignment on file, and my employer, Google,
> > also has a copyright assignment on file.
>
> For the record; your assignment appears to only be for Gnus, not for Emacs.
> However, this change is small enough not to need an assignment.
>
>
> --- End Message ---