[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremen
From: |
Remy van Elst |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 May 2015 19:47:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Here's the first 31000 lines of the log:
https://e75f5515c4f249ffa1122853af811b3e.objectstore.eu/duplicity/duplic
ity.txt
After these, it is all lines comparing the files on the machine. That
is still running. Is this helpfull?
On 05/28/2015 03:54 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> On 28.05.2015 15:28, Remy van Elst wrote:
>> Any suggestions or other help?
>>
>> On 05/25/2015 11:04 AM, Remy van Elst wrote:
>>> Duplicity seems to loose it's status when trying to do a
>>> incremental backup set over 14 days. The backup has been
>>> running for a while now but it is using about 1.5 TB of backend
>>> storage since 2 weeks. It is going to an Openstack swift object
>>> store as backend.
>>
>>> This is the command line:
>>
>>> duplicity --asynchronous-upload --verbosity 9 --log-file
>>> /var/log/duplicity.log --volsize 25 --tempdir="/tmp"
>>> --file-prefix="vps1.sparklingclouds.nl."
>>> --name="vps1.sparklingclouds.nl." --exclude-device-files
>>> --exclude-globbing-filelist=/etc/duplicity-backup/exclude.conf
>>> --full-if-older-than="14D" --no-encryption /
>>> swift://duplicity-backup
>>
>>> This is what caught my eye in the verbose log file:
>>
>>> File
>>> vps1.sparklingclouds.nl.duplicity-full.20150430T034939Z.vol166.difft
ar
>>
>>>
.g
>>
>>
>> z
>>> is part of known set File
>>> vps1.sparklingclouds.nl.duplicity-full.20150430T034939Z.vol1660.diff
ta
>>
>>>
r.
>>
>>
>> gz
>>> is part of known set Found backup chain [Tue Mar 24 14:42:44
>>> 2015]-[Tue Mar 24 14:42:44 2015] Last full backup is too old,
>>> forcing full backup
>>
>>
>>> The last full backup is from yesterday, and it should only do
>>> a full backup every 14 days.
>>
>>> When I do a collection status it seems all the incremental
>>> backups are gone:
>>
>>> Do note that I've got a wrapper script around duplicity which
>>> outputs the status, storage used and config settings:
>>
>>
>>> # Hostname: vps1.sparklingclouds.nl # IP: 192.0.2.10 # Storage
>>> used: 1.5T # Full backups to keep: 4 # Create full backup if
>>> last full backup is older than: 14D
>>> ----------------------------------------- # Duplicity
>>> collection status: # Local and Remote metadata are
>>> synchronized, no sync needed. # Last full backup date: Mon May
>>> 25 10:48:16 2015 # Collection Status # ----------------- #
>>> Connecting with backend: BackendWrapper # Archive dir:
>>> /root/.cache/duplicity/vps1.sparklingclouds.nl. # Found 4
>>> secondary backup chains. # Secondary chain 1 of 4: #
>>> ------------------------- # Chain start time: Tue Mar 24
>>> 14:42:44 2015 # Chain end time: Tue Mar 24 14:42:44 2015 #
>>> Number of contained backup sets: 1 # Total number of contained
>>> volumes: 3009 # Type of backup set:
>>> Time: Num volumes: # Full Tue Mar
>>> 24 14:42:44 2015 3009 # ------------------------- # Secondary
>>> chain 2 of 4: # ------------------------- # Chain start time:
>>> Wed Apr 8 05:49:18 2015 # Chain end time: Wed Apr 8 05:49:18
>>> 2015 # Number of contained backup sets: 1 # Total number of
>>> contained volumes: 3104 # Type of backup set:
>>> Time: Num volumes: # Full Wed Apr
>>> 8 05:49:18 2015 3104 # ------------------------- # Secondary
>>> chain 3 of 4: # ------------------------- # Chain start time:
>>> Thu Apr 16 05:49:37 2015 # Chain end time: Thu Apr 16 05:49:37
>>> 2015 # Number of contained backup sets: 1 # Total number of
>>> contained volumes: 3128 # Type of backup set:
>>> Time: Num volumes: # Full Thu Apr
>>> 16 05:49:37 2015 3128 # ------------------------- # Secondary
>>> chain 4 of 4: # ------------------------- # Chain start time:
>>> Thu Apr 30 05:49:39 2015 # Chain end time: Thu Apr 30 05:49:39
>>> 2015 # Number of contained backup sets: 1 # Total number of
>>> contained volumes: 736 # Type of backup set:
>>> Time: Num volumes: # Full Thu Apr
>>> 30 05:49:39 2015 736 # ------------------------- # Found
>>> primary backup chain with matching signature chain: #
>>> ------------------------- # Chain start time: Mon May 25
>>> 10:48:16 2015 # Chain end time: Mon May 25 10:48:16 2015 #
>>> Number of contained backup sets: 1 # Total number of contained
>>> volumes: 0 # Type of backup set: Time: Num volumes: #
>>> ------------------------- # No orphaned or incomplete backup
>>> sets found.
>>
>>
>>> Why does this happen and how can I get this back to normal?
>>
>
> which duplicity version?
>
> please post (zip attach)or pastebin the complete console output of
> a max.verbosity '-v9' status run. obfuscate strings in it you deem
> private.
>
> ..ede/duply.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Duplicity-talk
> mailing list address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVZ1TIAAoJECtnVb0bf4jcwn0H+gIrTgPHxbXj/1yoLIEQWDLT
1dNcfn7R7qcT15XQO3/pKYTXGeENAr29LnWWCMjHntLTqNm9G4VD/Ys3UPt3B1Sd
O13jfn/s8WlPxNh0aPR1fCdHoPv5QQphOFrEg5ESrDXPt2abes396qWKwbCzt2hx
45N69buxtz3UVEgZ91EoEv9d0R7Ol3pbooibD3al3xXRQHYsVAGu/Ch1jFTW0pBq
YwzOSNvRY4s0eCXK3+yeiKvLcypgaJHvpuuWF+9duOYigo8Rc5Oy14re7AG+zjOF
3SelWSp2ji/FIX4BoQXrKwv2KK97tICl92JCcS7nRcKSLtqaKWwWdkiek2jxCH0=
=npun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
0x1B7F88DC.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
0x1B7F88DC.asc.sig
Description: PGP signature
- [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/28
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, edgar . soldin, 2015/05/28
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/28
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?,
Remy van Elst <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, edgar . soldin, 2015/05/28
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/28
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, edgar . soldin, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, edgar . soldin, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, edgar . soldin, 2015/05/31
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/31
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, Remy van Elst, 2015/05/31
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?, edgar . soldin, 2015/05/31