[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] relative perf measurements?
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] relative perf measurements? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:01:04 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
AJ,
No one has done this to my knowledge. The problem that I can see is
that there would be too many variables. I have access to most of the
protocols, but they are all to different systems. To make it a fair
test, someone would have to have access to a system with all of the
protocols in one place. I don't think that system exists.
...Thanks,
...Ken
AJ Weber wrote:
> I searched around a little, but didn't find anything relevant...
>
> Has anyone done any relative performance measurements between the
> different backend connection options?
>
> I'm most interested in whether using an rsync server actually helps in
> any way (since we're already doing the rsync diff locally, I think)?
>
> Obviously this is all relative, but for "same target server, same
> network", are there any measurements for the same backup set sent over
> ftp, rsync, and scp? Curious why I haven't seen something about this
> already. I know all the YMMV cavaets, but has anyone taken the time to
> do this kind of experiment?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> AJ
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature