[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does
From: |
Nicolas Aspert |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:09:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>> I really disagree with this. Okay, ftp has its drawbacks but it is also
>> the fastest way of transferring data ! Security is sufficient if you
>> operate in a LAN, of course you should not rely on this if you transfer
>> your backups via the internet.
>>
>> So let's keep the ftp backend, unless an equivalent backend (in speed)
>> can be found ! Transferring 120GB+ can be a pain :)
>
> Sorry, did not mean to start such a storm. I do NOT propose to stop
> supporting FTP, but FTP has to be responsible for most of the trouble we
> have due to the quirks that are in a lot of implementations.
I did not either inteded to "storm" :), just pointing out a few reasons
about why ftp is not so good but works best in some cases :)
> FTP is one of the oldest protocols around, invented when the internet
> was a friendly environment. Now its not. Yes, FTP is quite usable over
> the intranet, but you really need something more secure and standard for
> the internet.
>
That is, imho, one of the strengths of duplicity, i.e. you can have scp
for secure transfer and bare ftp for speed. Sounds like a win-win to me,
despite the fact you might have to lose a few hair on ftp quirky
implementations...
I must say that the ncftp-based backend is working like a charm for me,
so keep up the good work !
Best regards
Nicolas
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Darik Horn, 2007/12/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Jacob, 2007/12/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Jacob, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, EdwardRF, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Nicolas Aspert, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Jacob, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does,
Nicolas Aspert <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Jacob, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Paul Walker, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Jacob, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Paul Walker, 2007/12/21
Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/17