[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Is duplicity dead?

From: Ben Escoto
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Is duplicity dead?
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 15:29:35 -0700

>>>>> "NA" == Nick Austin <address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote the following on Mon, 21 Jul 2003 01:35:31 -0700 (PDT)

  NA> I have noted that the CVS tree has not been updated in 4 months,
  NA> and my bugs and requests for help have been ignored.

  NA> Is this project dead?  Does anybody out there use duplicity and
  NA> need continuing support?  Perhaps my bug is unique, and other
  NA> people are not having problems?

Hi, sorry to have been AWOL these last few months.  Besides the usual
"real-life" work (scare quotes because I'm a grad student) that kept
me busy, I stopped using duplicity personally because the server where
a friend had given me space to backup was taken offline.  Also, I came
to think that eventually duplicity should abandon the tar format, but
never put together enough time to rewrite it for this.

Anyway, I'm happy to act as a maintainer and will try to answer some
emails and apply patches in a timely fashion, but will not try to fix
every bug.  It may be a while before I get around to adding new
features, for instance betting indexed volumes.  If anyone else wants
to implement any of the good suggestions made on this mailing list, go

Ben Escoto

Attachment: pgph7LCI_ladu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]