Re: [Dolibarr-user] 5.0.0 Reconciliation behaviour??

[Torsten Appelhagen]

Hi eldy,

I'm glad if I can help to make Dolibarr even better. ;)

Just one idea - you could have both features in one by sorting like this:
Start with the ones not yet reconciliated (but eligible), followed by 
the future ones which cannot be used yet, at last already reconciled lines.

This way for people like me who want to concentrate on "to do" 
everything important is on top while the latest account statements are 
still visible at a glance...?

BR
(and many thanks for your efforts!)
Torsten

Am 16.03.2017 um 20:48 schrieb Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy):
> Hi Torsten.
> Thanks for feedback.
>
> About shortcut in menu, this is a bug.
> I fixed it for 5.0.1
>
> For the question why we can still see already reconciliated lines in the
> page of conciliation, the reason is that there is 2 kind of user.
> People that want to see only the not reconciliated lines, like you, and
> people that want to see all.
> Change were introduced to be compliant with the 2 needs. However not
> completely finished for the first kind of user like you. The column
> account statement should provide a filter "conciliated or not" but
> thiswas forgotten. I will fix this soon.
>
> Laurent, aka eldy
>
>
> Le 15 mars 2017 21:23, "Torsten Appelhagen" <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> a écrit :
>
>     Hello,
>
>     now I finally managed to update our 4.0 to 5.0... ;)
>
>     We have one bank account. Before, there was a "reconcile" menu entry
>     on the left side below its name. Clicking it lead directly to the
>     list of open transactions (where "future" ones were not selectable),
>     so I only had to enter the number, tick entries and push enter.
>
>     Now the button only goes to "Bank entries" where I have to push
>     "reconcile" once more - why?
>     If I would like to see this list then I'd go from the account name
>     to the 2nd tab, there is no advantage in having this shortcut (which
>     has a wrong title if this behaviour is planned)...
>
>     Furthermore, after doing so I shall enter the number what is fine,
>     but the list below still shows loads of old entries which already
>     ARE reconciled, plus I noticed one row dated 29. March which I could
>     select right now. Again - WHY?
>
>     This is very confusing and hinders efficient working.
>     Did I miss some configuration option to change this? Or is it
>     possibly a bug?
>
>     PS: I'm using the German version so bear with me if the original
>     texts may be slightly different.
>
>     BR
>     Torsten
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Dolibarr-user mailing list
>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-user
>     <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-user>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dolibarr-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-user