[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package building
From: |
Johannes Brakensiek |
Subject: |
Re: Package building |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:40:25 +0100 |
Hi Sergii,
thank you for your reply!
On 19 Nov 2019, at 0:39, Sergii Stoian wrote:
Frankly speaking I don’t like themes idea almost totally. It’s
hard to achieve desired look and feel with themes without coding
(overriding some class methods). Plus themes support bloats the
GNUstep codebase.
I’m not into the details of the theming implementation, but to me it
looks a GNUstep based DE would be far from being bloated compared to
other current DEs. ;)
I understand that the initial idea was to attract more
users/developers, but… It’s not working.
Hm, yes. I think developers don’t need a nice UI at first place (and I
think most of what developers need luckily is already provided by Apple
as of today). But developers need happy users (if you’re not
developing only for yourself) and I think happy users need a stable,
solid and consistent UX. That would be provided by a NextStep based UI
guideline. But they also need a pretty UI (which is not what you’d
call that NextStep look nowadays, imho).
So, I want to make ideal NEXTSTEP interface first. Who knows maybe
some day I’ll want to change it to macOS-like… ;)
I think: Do it (some days earlier). From a users perspective my heart
was filled with joy and happiness when I saw what Bertrand had compiled
here:
https://github.com/BertrandDekoninck/rik.theme/blob/master/newscreen.png
;)
If we’d have some more screenshots of well crafted software looking
like this, it would be a huge benefit regarding the public impression of
GNUstep. It doesn’t need to be macOS, but to have a free DE that’s
getting close regarding UX/UI would be a thing I’d really like to see
and work with. (Especially since Apple is currently driving the
development of macOS to a state where I won’t want to use it
anymore…)
Etoile is great effort to create macOS-like DE with great fundamental
frameworks inside. I wish to borrow some of them someday… But its
development stopped AFAIK.
Yes, sadly. Merge it, use it. Once I come to start writing a serious app
I’ll give CoreObject a try and see how it works. ;)
Keep up your good work
Johannes
- Package building, (continued)
- Package building, Johannes Brakensiek, 2019/11/02
- Re: Package building, cobjective, 2019/11/02
- Re: Package building, Johannes Brakensiek, 2019/11/03
- Re: Package building, Sergii Stoian, 2019/11/04
- Re: Package building, Johannes Brakensiek, 2019/11/15
- Re: Package building, Fred Kiefer, 2019/11/15
- Re: Package building, Sergii Stoian, 2019/11/18
- Re: Package building, Fred Kiefer, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, cobjective, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Sergii Stoian, 2019/11/18
- Re: Package building,
Johannes Brakensiek <=
- Re: Package building, David Chisnall, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Umberto Cerrato, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Liam Proven, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Johannes Brakensiek, 2019/11/19
- Drag'n'Drop (was Package building), Derek Fawcus, 2019/11/19
- Re: Drag'n'Drop (was Package building), Ivan Vučica, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Matt Butch, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Ivan Vučica, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Johannes Brakensiek, 2019/11/20