Re: runtime 2.0 issues.

[David Chisnall]

On 06/03/2019 01:29, Andreas Fink wrote:
> I just retried with clang-8 compiled from source.
>
> Indeed this problem in ./configure of gnustep-base went away.
>
> However all tests still fail.
>
> its compiled this way during the test:
>
> clang  -Wl,-rpath,/Users/afink/development/gnustep2/base/Source/./obj -rdynamic 
> -rdynamic -rdynamic  -rdynamic -pthread  -fexceptions 
> -fobjc-runtime=gnustep-2.0 -fblocks -o obj/basictypes  
> ./obj/basictypes.obj/basictypes.m.o 
> -L/Users/afink/development/gnustep2/base/Source/./obj 
> -L/root/GNUstep/Library/Libraries -L/usr/local/lib -lgnustep-base -lpthread 
> -lobjc -lm
>
>
> this produces a binary without an error but when running the binary, you simply 
> get a segfault. and thats the case for all binaries created in the test.
>
> Running it in lldb shows that it throws an exception which then while in the 
> exception, it creates an exception which then creates a recursive infinite loop 
> until the stack is filled up.
> Its caused by this:

This looks like the issue that I already told you about with BFD ld 
failing to correctly link -base Additions.  Did you link -base with Gold 
or LLD (which work) or BFD ld (which doesn't)?

David