Re: ProjectCenter template and conflicting resource files

[Gregory Casamento]

The correct course of action is to keep the gorm file.  It is what the majority of the apps written using GNUstep use.  I would prefer that another template be created which uses the gsmarkup.  In retrospect I'm. It certain why this was done.  

Sorry for the top post I am replying from my phone. 

GC 

 

On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 17:24 Graham Lee <graham@iamleeg.com> wrote:

Hi all,

the Application project template in ProjectCenter contains both a .gorm file and .gsmarkup files. The GNUmakefile includes all of these as resources for the target. This is confusing, as I wasn't sure what I needed to edit in order to design my application. After some testing (on Linux, I haven't tested on Mac) I found that the .gorm file was being used by the built app, but the .gsmarkup files do not seem to be. I tested this by editing the title of a main menu item in each then building the app: only when I edited the menu in the .gorm file did my changes appear.

I will fix this template up so that it only contains one UI definition. My preference would be to keep the .gorm file, but would the maintainers prefer people use GORM or GSMarkup? Or is there a reason I've missed why the project template would include both?

Thanks,
Graham.

_______________________________________________

Discuss-gnustep mailing list

Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org

https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep