[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED)
From: |
Niels Grewe |
Subject: |
Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED) |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:52:35 +0000 |
> Am 25.01.2016 um 16:29 schrieb David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org>:
>
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 15:12, Tristan Bellogi <bellogi@orange.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Debian clang.deb install libobjc4, Apple has libobjc4, Gunstep recommends
>> its own libobjc2 ?
>
> Debian appends a version number to the GCC libobjc package. It supports the
> same features of Objective-C as GCC (i.e. nothing vaguely recent). It is
> absolutely not the one that you want. Please complain to the Debian clang
> maintainer that it’s pulling in this dependency, as it’s not the one that he
> wants.
Actually I filed a bug report a about that a while ago [0], suggesting to drop
the dependency to a recommendation, but unfortunately that didn’t elicit a
response yet.
Cheers,
Niels
--
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809991
- Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED), Tristan Bellogi, 2016/01/25
- Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED), David Chisnall, 2016/01/25
- Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED),
Niels Grewe <=
- Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED), Svetlana A. Tkachenko, 2016/01/28
- Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED), David Chisnall, 2016/01/29
- Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED), Svetlana A. Tkachenko, 2016/01/29
- Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED), David Chisnall, 2016/01/30
- Re: Debian 8 (Not really SOLVED), Svetlana A. Tkachenko, 2016/01/31