Re: Savannah vs. Gitlab

[Gregory Casamento]

The issue I'm having at this point is that the FSF providing, in many
cases, more obstacles than it is removing.

GC

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Svetlana A. Tkachenko
<svetlana@members.fsf.org> wrote:
>> Gitlab is OPEN SOURCE. :)  It is not proprietary.
>
> 1) It does not label its frontend's JavaScript with the licenses (C0.0).
> 2) Gitlab links to about.gitlab.com which sells a proprietary product.
> The free GitLab version is bait-and-switch for their so-called
> enterprise version which is proprietary software.
> 3) GitLab does not encourage submissions which are freely licensed (C5).
>
> I might suggest things from this list:
> - http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhyChooseSavannah/
>   - repo.or.cz, can create new repo without review, but no issue tracker
>   - Redmine has issue tracker and source code hosting and wiki (but not
>   multilingual afaik, maybe with a plugin)
>   - ... (you pick)
>
> --
> Svetlana A. Tkachenko
> Member of the Free Software Foundation
> www.fsf.org  www.gnu.org www.freenode.net



-- 
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
http://ind.ie/phoenix/