discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is anyone using -fobjc-gc?


From: John W Kennedy
Subject: Re: Is anyone using -fobjc-gc?
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:54:41 -0400
User-agent: Unison/2.2

The betas for Xcode 7 (the version that goes with OS X 10.11 ["El Capitan"] and iOS 9) have the warning, "OS X 10.11 is the last major release of OS X that will support the previously deprecated garbage collection runtime."


On 2015-08-24 09:08:26 +0000, ChanMaxthon said:

I would suggest getting rid of -fobjc-gc and let ARC handle NSMatrix.

Apple have long dropped GC support in Xcode so I think no recent project will suffer from this loss, and since most of the Objective-C writers now have more or less some experience tackling iOS where GC never existed in the first place, this is even less of a problem.

However we should put more focus on fixing Toll-Free Bridging and embrace for the impact of Apple open sourcing Swift.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 21, 2015, at 18:34, Fred Kiefer <fredkiefer@gmx.de> wrote:



Am 21.08.2015 um 12:14 schrieb David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org>:

It was possible to compile -base (and, I think, -gui) in Apple-compatible GC-optional mode, where retain and release are used, but so are the GC hooks, allowing the frameworks to be shipped in one binary that could work with RR or GC programs, but I have not tried this for some years and do not have a great deal of confidence that it still works.

As for gui, they only place where the GC macros get used is NSMatrix and I was about to remove them silently, as I didn't believe in this special magic anyway.

Fred
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep


--
John W Kennedy
"Give up vows and dogmas, and fixed things, and you may grow like That. ...you may come to think a blow bad, because it hurts, and not because it humiliates. You may come to think murder wrong, because it is violent, and not because it is unjust."
 -- G. K. Chesterton.  "The Ball and the Cross"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]