discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Kickstarter was not successful... but it did help things...


From: Riccardo Mottola
Subject: Re: Kickstarter was not successful... but it did help things...
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:14:28 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22

Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 20.12.2013 21:04, schrieb James Carthew:
I see a gnustep desktop as having at first boot the user choose
apple, next, or windows GUI style giving the best of all worlds and the
user total control.
While you have a few very good ideas, I simply can't wrap my head around
why everybody thinks in terms of whole distributions. With a complete
distro you have ten times more non-GNUstep work than this small group
can afford and, worse, you compete directly with the big distros. The
chance to become more popular than Ubuntu is probably 0.00001%, no
matter how excellent this GNUstep distro works.
I do agree, although once you have working and clean packages, making your own distro is easier. If I'd were to make a distro I'd spin off an existing one, not starting one afrom scratch.
For me it is absolutely not interesting though.

My mid-term goal would be to have X packages that make up a working and usable environment and being able to install them. Like you can choose to use XFCE, LDE or GNOME. You will have one or two flavours of GNUstep stuff (I am thinking here of something more GAP and more Etoile oriented). Most probably they will have a lot in common too.

And no, average people don't install distros just for fun. Typical end
users run the OS their PC came with and retire the PC when this OS is no
longer usable. Even the big distros struggle a lot to overcome this
laziness. Accordingly, trying to do a whole distro is a sure recipe for
staying small and invisible.

If you integrate GNUstep into existing distros, including Windows and
Mac OS X, you compete just on the application level. And the chance for
e.g. GNUmail to become as popular as Thunderbird are many orders of
magnitude higher.
True. Besides, we even have it already packaged, but the packages do suck and the surrounding environment is often spotty.

I am not working on a dozen applications to compete on the application level, but on the application-inside-my-favourite-environment level.

Thunderbird and Firefox are fine, they just have sucky menus, ugly tabs, scrollers on the wrong side. I'm using seamonkey to send this mail and it is this way since years, since GNUmail broke :(

Riccardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]