[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sending UDP packets
From: |
Saso Kiselkov |
Subject: |
Re: Sending UDP packets |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:08:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stupid to reply to myself, but I forgot to add one last drawback:
224.0.0.1 isn't routable (224.0.0.0/24 is designated as link-local).
That means that should you ever need to span across a router, you're
pretty much out of luck.
- --
Saso
Saso Kiselkov wrote:
> It's better not to use 224.0.0.1 - that really is only for diagnostic
> purposes. I recommend using something in the 239.0.0.0/8 range
> (administratively scoped multicast), so that you can be relatively sure
> you don't hit unrelated services on other machines.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksOU60ACgkQRO8UcfzpOHDqnACgmJzqqV32CmmWtkUn4CYeH0w/
KwgAoMwAB3acrgiEfgPKWyfVp7cHyMlV
=Ilcy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Sending UDP packets, (continued)
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2009/11/25
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Saso Kiselkov, 2009/11/26
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Andreas Höschler, 2009/11/26
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Saso Kiselkov, 2009/11/26
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Andreas Höschler, 2009/11/26
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Saso Kiselkov, 2009/11/26
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Andreas Höschler, 2009/11/26
- Re: Sending UDP packets, Saso Kiselkov, 2009/11/26
Re: Sending UDP packets, Andreas Höschler, 2009/11/26
Re: Sending UDP packets, Derek Fawcus, 2009/11/26