discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: NSMatrix Bug Fix III

 From: Fred Kiefer Subject: Re: NSMatrix Bug Fix III Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:59:59 +0100 User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20060911)

```Andreas HÃ¶schler schrieb:
> a third one:
>
> - (BOOL)getRow:(int*)row column:(int*)column forPoint:(NSPoint)aPoint
> {
> ...
>       if (_rFlags.flipped_view == NO)
>         {
> //         approxRow = _numRows - approxRow - 1;
>         }
> ...
> }
>

Hi Andreas,

all your changes are about the same issue. They seem to suggest that
even for a non flipped matrix the row number directly matches the point
and no swapping is needed. I am not sure, if this is really true. Do you
have any facts that prove this?
I expect that you have written a subclass of NSMatrix and this subclass
is non-flipped and now things go wrong. This may be due to a problem in

Although you may know all this, I will try to explain how in GNUstep
NSMatrix is supposed to work.

Lets say we have a matrix with bounds ((0, 0), (10, 50)). This matrix
has five rows and just one column. As all matrices are flipped it will
look like this

(0,0) row 1
row 2
row 3
row 4
row 5 (10, 50)

Now lets assume we have a flipped subclass with a similar layout. How
would it look like?

Like this?
row 5 (10, 50)
row 4
row 3
row 2
(0,0) row 1

Or like this?

row 1 (10, 50)
row 2
row 3
row 4
(0,0) row 5

For me it looks like the code in GNustep assumes that the later is the
case, but your code suggests the former. Now when looking for the row
that the point (5, 20) is in GNUstep would say row 4 whereas you expect
row 2. I don't know which interpretation is correct, but I don't see how
the GNUstep one might lead to the problem you are seeing. This suggest
that something else must be going on as well. And here only you have the
means to look into it.

Cheers,
Fred

```