Re: Embedded GNUstep - new rumours about embedded MacOS X and call for support

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On 24 Dec 2006, at 10:16, Matt Rice wrote:

> i'm not going to go so far as to object to this, but
> it seems as though there are already alot of
> unimplemented methods and classes in GNUstep, and it
> would be nice if they were easier to find when one
> wanted to work on something,

It would be quite easy to mark all unimplemented stubs consistently  
so that autogsdoc would document them as unimplemented, and they  
would raise an exception at runtime...

- (id) aMethod
{
  /** not implemented */
  [self notImplemented: _cmd];
  return nil.
}

We could even extend autogsdoc  so that '/** <notimplemented /> */'  
could be auto-expanded to a big red warning in the documentation  
along with a request that someone work on it and instruction to them  
abbout how they can get started.

Worth doing?