[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New controller questions
|
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
|
Subject: |
Re: New controller questions |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:10:06 +0100 |
On 1/18/06, Dennis Leeuw <dleeuw@made-it.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
[...]
> I also have a couple of other questions:
> - Libraries has a Libraries/Resources directory, but Tools does not.
> Shouldn't that be also available? And there are only plists for
> gnustep-base and gnustep-gui no other entries for other libs available.
> Is this correct?
In theory, a Tool can have Resources. Not sure how much sense there is
having them.
> - Frameworks sometimes uses a version of A, and sometimes a real version
> like 0.4.1 what is the rule here? Seems like if <type>Version (e.g.
> ApplicationVersion) is not set in the plist A is used, correct?
Depends on whether the programmer sets
${FRAMEWORK_NAME}_CURRENT_VERSION_NAME=<version> or not. If it isn't
set, GNUstep starts with an A, then a newer version would be B, ...
It's always safe to assume that there is a link named Current that
points to the current version.
> - For e.g. StepTalk the generic data is stored in Library/StepTalk,
> while there is a ApplicationSupport directory. What is the idea/future?
Personally, I'd prefer if all application related stuff, like
"plugins" and preferences, would go under
ApplicationSupport/<application>/...
[...]
Just my $0.02
--
Chris