[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep and session management
From: |
Roman Belenov |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep and session management |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:40:21 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (windows-nt) |
Markus Hitter <mah@jump-ing.de> writes:
>> Is there a fallback for applications that don't explicitly observe this
>> notification (like passing terminate: to NSApplication instance) ?
>
> Since about any Mac OS X app bases on NSApplication and NSApplication handles
> this, there's no need for a fallback mechanism.
Do you mean that NSApplication observes NSWorkspaceWillPowerOffNotification
internally ? That doesn't seems reasonable (it would rely on notification
processing order in current implementation, since reference manual mentions
that it is undefined); anyway, is there some documentation confirming this ?
--
With regards, Roman.
- Re: GNUstep and session management, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep and session management, Roman Belenov, 2005/10/06
- Re: GNUstep and session management, Roman Belenov, 2005/10/06
- Re: GNUstep and session management, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/10/06
- Re: GNUstep and session management, Roman Belenov, 2005/10/06
- Re: GNUstep and session management, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/10/06
- Re: GNUstep and session management, Roman Belenov, 2005/10/06
Re: GNUstep and session management, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/10/06
Re: GNUstep and session management, Markus Hitter, 2005/10/06
Re: GNUstep and session management, Sašo Kiselkov, 2005/10/07