[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
From: |
Richard Kenner |
Subject: |
Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 04 08:01:15 EST |
Since Geoff has objected to every design proposal I made, then
naturally I was (and am) expecting a constructive alternative.
It would be nice if such a thing could be done, but I don't see it as
a requirement. It is, after all, your project and what you are
essentially doing is asking for him to do the design for you.
It's true that if somebody doesn't like a design proposal they should be able
to articulate what exactly it is they don't like about it. I don't believe
Geoff has done that completely, which is a legitimate complaint, but saying
"if you don't like my proposal, make your own" isn't fair: it's not his
project. On the other hand, I perfectly well understand the difficulty in
articulating what one doesn't like about a proposal. I've been there many
times: when you're very close to a project, you often get a "gut feeling"
that a patch isn't the right way to do something, but find it very hard to
say exactly why you think that and it can often take a lot of time to figure
it out.
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, (continued)
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Rogelio Serrano, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Helge Hess, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/11/18
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Matt Austern, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Ziemowit Laski, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Phil Edwards, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Chuck Robey, 2004/11/21
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Phil Edwards, 2004/11/22
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Dale Johannesen, 2004/11/19
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?, Dan Grillo, 2004/11/19
Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?,
Richard Kenner <=