[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spatial finder
From: |
Rogelio Serrano |
Subject: |
Re: spatial finder |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 18:29:25 +0800 |
I read that page thats why i started thinking about it.
On 2004-06-16 18:19:02 +0800 Björn Giesler <giesler@ira.uka.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for an discussion about what's good about a spatial file manager and what's
> bad about a non-spatial one, see John Siracusa's excellent article at
> http://arstechnica.com/paedia/f/finder/finder-1.html.
>
> Am 16.06.2004 um 11:58 schrieb Nicolas Roard:
>> Something that works great with few files and shallow directories, and
>> badly with plenty of files and deep directories. Eg, it's not that good for
>> today computer's use.
>>
>> You just need to see the users response to the now by-default nautilus
>> spatial mode.
>
> Most people using Nautilus (or Linux, for that matter) are geeks and
> proto-geeks. This class of people has notoriously little knowledge of good UI
> design. (The user's response to the GNUstep look, i.e. the complaints that
> it's bland and the clamoring for "themes", is another example.)
>
> I agree that the spatial layout is badly suited for today's Unix file system
> hierarchy. However, today's unix file system hierarchy is very badly suited
> for users or user interfaces. Non-geeks don't understand stuff like
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/System.xsession; they do understand
> /Configuration/Startup Items. GNUstep (with bundles etc.) can help on the
> path towards a user-friendly or (better) user-created hierarchy. And to
> manage that, a spatial file manager helps tremendously.
>
> My suggestion would be: Bow to the reality that the current Unix hierarchy is
> horrible and won't change soon, and that the GNUstep crowd consists largely
> of geeks who are more interested in maximizing control over their system than
> maximizing ease of use. Leave the spatial thing for now, since it's not quite
> easy to implement. But keep it in mind for later; it's certainly more than
> worth to be implemented eventually.
>
Im working on Y anyway so i why wait.
> Regards,
> Björn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
- Re: spatial finder, (continued)
- Re: spatial finder, Nicolas Roard, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Rogelio Serrano, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Frederico Muñoz, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Rogelio Serrano, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Nicolas Roard, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Enrico Sersale, 2004/06/19
- Re: spatial finder, Michael Baehr, 2004/06/19
- Re: spatial finder, Enrico Sersale, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Björn Giesler, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder,
Rogelio Serrano <=
- Re: spatial finder, Pete French, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Larry Coleman, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Dennis Leeuw, 2004/06/16
- Re: spatial finder, Enrico Sersale, 2004/06/16
Re: spatial finder, Rogelio Serrano, 2004/06/16
Re: spatial finder, Sascha Erni, .rb, 2004/06/16
Re: spatial finder, Nicolas Roard, 2004/06/16
Re: spatial finder, Nicolas Roard, 2004/06/16