Re: [RFC] GSObjCRuntime API conventions

[Adam Fedor]

On Jun 3, 2004, at 5:09 AM, David Ayers wrote:

> The conventions I'd like to have comments on, is the explicit  
> Class/Instance separation and the explicit Inherited/NotInherited  
> separation as apposed to collapsing those functions into on which  
> takes BOOL flags to determine whether Class vs. Instance or recursive  
> behavior is requested.
I'd rather see a smaller API.

> PS: This also touches:  
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnustep/2004-04/ 
> msg00176.html
> as we may want to replace (via deprecation)
> NSArray *GSObjCMethodNames(id obj);
> with
> NSArray *GSObjCGetMethodNames(Class cls,
>                               BOOL searchInstanceMethods,
>                               BOOL searchSuperClasses);
Sure.