Re: why not DirectFB?

[andrez]

Chad Hardin wrote:
> Yeah, I'm working on this, but it's slow.  one of those "Real Life" things.
>
> I don't think there would be any objections to accepting a directfb 
> patch once I have one  :-)
>
> Remember though, some people prefer X.
>
> Chad

Iunderstand, but I guess, that people can commit code would they know 
more about your idea. Real life is a thing that Micro$oft benefits from. 
But the more people we have working on the project,  the more real-life 
thing impacts us.
As far as I understand, the DirectFB guys have also all that sound 
libraries integrated, and when using DirectFB you need no window manager 
and it has it's own cut'n paste.