[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
Glenn Andreas |
Subject: |
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:48:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC) |
In article <D7Chc.81731$L9.5550210@phobos.telenet-ops.be>,
David Stes <stes@D5E02AFE.kabel.telenet.be> wrote:
> In comp.lang.objective-c Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.org> wrote:
> >
> > It's a place where NeXT never existed, POC is
> > the only Objective-C implementation,
>
> POC (http://users.pandora.be/stes/compiler.html) at least doesn't use the
> crippled Apple memory management.
>
Instead it's crippled with not being thread safe, lack of support for
categories, exception handling that doesn't actually implement exception
handling (local error handling only and even that has other major errors
like a hard-coded depth for nesting of those error handlers),
non-standard extensions, and an author that thinks that Color should be
a subclass of String (as should a bar or pie-wedge in a chart).
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Michael Ash, 2004/04/20
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, James Spencer, 2004/04/20
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Ben Golding, 2004/04/23
- Re: POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Helge Hess, 2004/04/23
- Re: POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Laurent Deniau, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Defacto standards (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Gregory John Casamento, 2004/04/22