[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frameworks integration
|
From: |
S.J.Chun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Frameworks integration |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:21:55 +0900 (KST) |
At least, GNUstepWeb and SOPE has each merits: GNUstepWeb is much more
compatible with WebObjects
in terms of EOF, and SOPE is known for its more mature state. :-) I'm using and
testing both of them, and it's
very interesting...
----- Original Message -----
From: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
To: discuss GNUstep <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:21:27 +0100
Subject: Re: Frameworks integration
On 27.02.2004, at 18:35, Adam Fedor wrote:
>> The proposal is to put skyrix-xml and Tryst in the cvs (dev-libs),
>> and possibly change their name to be more developer-friendly (ie a
>> descriptive name followed by "kit" --
>> RendezvousKit or ServiceDiscoveryKit for Tryst for example).
>
> To be put in CVS, they would need to change the license and assign the
> copyright to the FSF. I think Chris was open to this but I have a
> feeling Helge would not.
Correct. I don't see the point of copyright assignment to FSF and
indeed this is AFAIK impossible in Germany (you cannot assign copyright
to someone else).
On the other side all libraries of OGo are LGPL, so I really wonder
whether a copyright assignment its absolutely necessary for GNUstep for
self contained additions. Its certainly not required for producing free
software.
We also have a somewhat weird situation with regards to gnustep-web. I
think it was mainly started by Manuel because there was nothing
available and the SKYRiX stuff wasn't yet available as GPL.
Yet with OGo we now do have a high quality and proven WebObjects clone
and gnustep-web is somewhat obsolete for practical purposes (no offense
intended at all!) Not sure how we should proceed on this front.
best regards,
Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge
OpenGroupware.org
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
- Re: Frameworks integration, (continued)
- Re: Frameworks integration, Chris B. Vetter, 2004/02/27
- Re: Frameworks integration, Adam Fedor, 2004/02/27
- Re: Frameworks integration, Chris B. Vetter, 2004/02/27
- Re: Frameworks integration, Helge Hess, 2004/02/27
- Re[2]: Frameworks integration, Manuel Guesdon, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, nicolas, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, Helge Hess, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, Quentin Mathé, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, Adam Fedor, 2004/02/28
Re: Frameworks integration, Brent Fulgham, 2004/02/27
Re: Frameworks integration,
S.J.Chun <=