[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control (WAS: Re: deferreddeal

From: Chris B. Vetter
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control (WAS: Re: deferreddeallocation)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:25:21 -0700

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:58:39 +0200
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <address@hidden>

> On 17.10.2003 21:35:01 "Chris B. Vetter" wrote:
> >There's no way a test unit will be able to cover these issues.
> The fact that unittesting isn't a "solve everything" solution
> shouldn't lead to disregard to the merrits it has to offer. Don't be

That wasn't implied and I don't, as I use them myself whenever possible.

> so over sceptic. Give yourself a buzz and actually *try* unittesting.
> You'll be astonished how many bugs you'll discover with ease.

I merely wanted to point out, as I stated earlier, that a testing
environment _cannot_ be regarded as a swiss army knife against bugs.
There simply are too many issues that would have to be covered.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]