[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control (WAS: Re: deferreddeal

From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control (WAS: Re: deferreddeallocation)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:58:39 +0200

On 17.10.2003 21:35:01 "Chris B. Vetter" wrote:
>Still, I don't see how this will cover 'faulty' implementations. Yes,
>you will be able to tell whether it works. Yes, you will be able to find
>(at least some) bugs. But no, you won't be able to tell, whether the
>current implementation is _correct_ that is, follows the specification.

<example deleted>

>There's no way a test unit will be able to cover these issues.

The fact that unittesting isn't a "solve everything" solution shouldn't 
lead to disregard to the merrits it has to offer. Don't be so over 
sceptic. Give yourself a buzz and actually *try* unittesting. You'll be 
astonished how many bugs you'll discover with ease.

greetings, Lars

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]