[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:46:22 +0100 |
> GNUstep works perfectly fine (with one exception) on FreeBSD using the
> following ports/versions:
>
[versions snipped]
> The exception is, that with the scenario above, you will have to DISable
> OpenSSL support in gnustep-base - otherwise Apps/Tools will SIGSEGV when
> trying to access URLs (http and ftp). I'm not sure whether this is a
> general problem or is due to OpenSSL being compiled with gcc2.95.3...
Interesting - I have exactly the versions you describe above, yet I am
getting a coredump whenever I try and read a .gmodel file. It woorked
fine until last weekend, and I am still trying to figure out what changed.
Does your version load gmodels correctly and how recent is the source ?
Also, can you build 'base' which debug=yes, or does it cause a gcc
compiler error in GSXML ? I see both these symtoms on my current system,
which is worrying as its been fine under FreeBSD until now.
-bat.
PS: OS version is 4.7-RC2
- Error compiling Gnustep, Pavel West, 2002/09/28
- gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Jim McLoughlin, 2002/09/28
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Pete French, 2002/09/29
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Jim McLoughlin, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Dennis Leeuw, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?,
Pete French <=
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Pete French, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Pete French, 2002/09/30