[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep directory layout
From: |
Martin Brecher |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep directory layout |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 01:17:25 +0200 |
Hi all, -
>Actually, if there is no Developer domain, then there really is less
>restraint. There is nothing that prevents anyone from adding a Developer
>domain (user, sysadmin, and/or package maintainer) and installing stuff
>there. Making the Developer domain mandatory actually reduces the
>flexibility that people have to put things where they want.
There are a few arguments for sticking with the regular domains for developer
files, too.
1. Headers chould be in the Library folder, it's near to the Libraries dir -
and headers should always be installed (they don't take much
space either). A lot of Linux distributions spilt libraries into two packages,
the one with the library/tools and another '-devel' one
containing headers, etc. On Linux/BSD/*nix systems you are forced to search for
the devel packages of a lot of imporant libs the first
time you just want to compile some simple program - that's annoying: the
development files are an essential part of the unix system (that's
different for OS X, though).
2. Within the Library directory we could create a Developer folder containing
examples and maybe documentation. So 'normal users'
won't stumble over it when searching the Documentation folder for help.
3. On OS X you already have the e.g. Utilities subfolder within Applications. I
guess it wouldn't be so unlogical to have a Developer
folder within the Applications directory on GNUstep. (Apart from the extra
ApplicationWrappers and maybe Administration subfolders,
etc).
4. Since tools are used from the command line anyway, it doesn't matter whether
they reside in [Sys|Loc|Net]/Tools or Developer/Tools
anyway.
Greetings,
Martin
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, (continued)
RE: GNUstep directory layout, HVaisbur, 2002/09/11
RE: GNUstep directory layout, HVaisbur, 2002/09/11
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Nicola Pero, 2002/09/12