[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defaults being destroyed
From: |
Alexey I. Froloff |
Subject: |
Re: Defaults being destroyed |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:27:08 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:07:37AM +0100, Pete French wrote:
> I kkind of had to skip over the earlier part of this thread
> in detail, but is the general consensus that the fault is
> caused by not locking a file wwhen the defaults are wwritten
> (and is this because the atomic operations do not work
> properly in the file access methods?). Is there any reason
> why we cannoy use operating system advisory locking to do
> all of this, rather than putting in distributed locks ?
>
> please tell me if I missed the point utterly...
NSDistributedLock can lock a not-yet-existant object. And it
may be not a regular file...
--
Regards, Sir Raorn.
AIF5-RIPN, AIF5-RIPE, Binec System Administrator.
pgpbQCeos7pqf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Defaults being destroyed, Stefan Urbanek, 2002/08/26
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Adam Fedor, 2002/08/26
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Stefan Urbanek, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Alexey I. Froloff, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Alexey I. Froloff, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Alexey I. Froloff, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed, Pete French, 2002/08/27
- Re: Defaults being destroyed,
Alexey I. Froloff <=
- Re: Defaults being destroyed (Solved?), Stefan Urbanek, 2002/08/27
Re: Defaults being destroyed, Ian Jones, 2002/08/26