[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUStep: An Apology for Announcing Donation of Proprietary Software
From: |
David Golden |
Subject: |
Re: GNUStep: An Apology for Announcing Donation of Proprietary Software to the Project |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:03:03 +0000 |
On Saturday 22 December 2001 12:55, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
> This is exactly one of the reasons IMHO why GNU will never succeed, why it
> is doomed to fail - like all other 'extreme' ways of dealing with
> realities. This is a very poor move. I am deeply disappointed.
>
I'd have to say the poor move was accepting the donation in the first place
(even poorer if the donation was sought after) - particularly given the
existence of plex86. I don't regard the GNU project position as
particularly "extreme" in software licensing - the extreme ones are the
proprietary software corporations who are fighting to make things like
restrictive EULAs (which are not simply based on copyright laws, unlike the
GPL) fully enforceable worldwide. The GPL doesn't require new laws, their
position does.
I certainly don't think GNU is doomed to fail. After all, it's shown
slow-and-steady growth for years, unlike the flash-in-the-pan fly-by-nights
in the bulk of the proprietary world.
And anyway, it's a common trick in debating and law to take a _really_
extreme position to soften the blow of a slightly less extreme one - things
like the SSSCA are softening people up so they may even be happy about letting
a slightly less draconian, but still really bad, thing through - So, if
anything, given the new pulls on the pendulum from the "opposing side"* to
the FSF, we should expect the formation of a much more extreme organisation
than the FSF, but pulling the pendulum on the "same side", perhaps one
calling for mandated "Total Freedom of Information", calling for new laws in
which is is a civil offense to withhold any pattern of information from
anyone, using a similar line of reasoning about software to the one David
Brin uses about personal informations in "The Transparent Society - Will
Technology Force use to choose between Privacy and Freedom" (no, this is NOT
the same as the Big Brother scenario - see
http://www.kirthrup.com/brin/tschp1.html)
This of course, leads to an escalation of sillyness, but hey, that's life...
* I've put these in quotation marks becasue the software licensing issue
isn't really a 1-D spectrum.
Re: GNUStep: An Apology for Announcing Donation of Proprietary Software to the Project, Adam Fedor, 2001/12/21
RE: GNUStep: An Apology for Announcing Donation of Proprietary Software to the Project, Scott Francis, 2001/12/21
Re: GNUStep: An Apology for Announcing Donation of Proprietary Software to the Project, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2001/12/22
RE: GNUStep: An Apology for Announcing Donation of Proprietary Software to the Project, Peron, Stéphane, 2001/12/21