[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory
From: |
Helge Hess |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:41:20 +0100 |
David Relson wrote:
> So we have:
>
> GNUstep
> Local
> Apps
> Developer
> Documentation
> Headers
> Makefiles
> Network
> System
> Apps
> Developer
> Documentation
> Headers
> Makefiles
> Libraries
> Library
> Tools
> share
BTW: I would vote for separating makefiles and environment.
> Looking at my environment variables I already have the following (which are
> consistent with the above):
>
> GNUSTEP_ROOT=/usr/GNUstep
> GNUSTEP_LOCAL_ROOT=/usr/GNUstep/Local
> GNUSTEP_NETWORK_ROOT=/usr/GNUstep/Network
> GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_ROOT=/usr/GNUstep/System
> GNUSTEP_USER_ROOT=/home/relson/GNUstep
>
> The "shouldn't be contained" clause implies that there should be no
> GNUSTEP_ROOT variable. This seems to be an inconsistency.
Yes. I would say that the GNUSTEP_ROOT environment variable is
unnecessary/useless, I don't know what this should be good for ? Any
file should always be installed in a GNUSTEP_something_ROOT.
Helge
--
SKYRIX Software AG - http://www.skyrix.com
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, Sungjin Chun, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, David Relson, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, Helge Hess, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, David Relson, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, Helge Hess, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, Helge Hess, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory, David Relson, 2001/01/10
- Re: GNUstep/?/Developer directory,
Helge Hess <=
GNUstep/?/Developer directory, David Wetzel, 2001/01/10