Re: explaining i/q

[David Hagood]

> Now, unless I am completely wrong, the model you use captures both the 
> I and the Q samples at the same time. This means that there is no 
> element of 'time'.
> In electronics, this works fine, due to the nature of mixing and a 
> difference of phase of the two Local-Oscillators.
> But that's not how people see the spinning doll. Our eyes do not see a 
> difference in phase of light. For us humans, the object is spinning 
> due to the element of "time": multiple observations.

Do you have 2 eyes? or one?

You see the model from 2 perspectives at once - left eye, right eye. 
Just like you have I and Q. Each eye sees the model from a different 
perspective - maybe not as dramatic as 90 degrees, but a different 
perspective.

I made that point repeatedly.

Did it not sink in?

Or are you just trying to argue against anything that isn't what you 
already planned on doing?

OpenPGP_0x5B9DC79986207D69.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature