On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, George Nychis <
address@hidden> wrote:
> I double checked the scrambler code and I really do not see anything wrong
> with it, it seems to meet the 802.11 spec for DSSS. Then I found something
> in the spec that says that the transmitter need not start with the seed,
> since the receiver's descrambler is self-synchronizing. So then I figured,
> maybe the transmitter just started with a different seed... so I generated
> 128 different signatures, for all 128 different possible scrambler seeds,
> and NONE correlate.
>
> Maybe it's using a different scrambling algorithm? I'm running out of
> ideas.
It might transmit the opposite of what it is expecting to flush the