Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Build errors

[Robert McGwier]

Agreed


Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:45:33PM -0500, Illix wrote:
>   
> > I'm getting the same problem (as far as I can tell) on an Ubuntu
> > 6.10machine.  The build fails with undefined references in
> > libmblock.so and libmblock-qa.so.
> >
> >     
>
>
> OK, I've looked at the log file that Bob sent me and compared it to
> what I see on my machines.  The difference appears to be something in
> libtool.
>
>
>   

---snip----
> Although they both make the same call to libtool, libtool spits out a
> different command line on the two systems.  On Bob's (and I assume
> Illix's) machine, the output of libtool contains --rpath (pointing to
> the install, not build directory!), whereas my machine lists the
> actual paths needed to find the pieces.
>   
I did a test before I read this note.  I ran make install in the pmt 
directory after the mblock make fails.  After this bandaid step,   if I 
run make in the trunk directory,  the make succeeds.  I concur with your 
analysis. Don't you hate these kinds of issues?

> Bob's machine is using 
>
>   ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 Debian 1.5.22-4 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 
> 22:14:06)
>
> I'm using (SuSE 10.1)
>
>   ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06)
>
> It looks like the Debian folks may have applied some kind of a patch to
> libtool 1.5.22 that could be causing the problem.
>
> Can any debian/ubuntu users figure out the difference?  That is,
> what's the debian/ubuntu patch, and when and why was it applied?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
>   

Bob


--
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair
"Taking fun as simply fun and earnestness in earnest shows
how thoroughly thou none of the two discernest." - Piet Hine