[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Criteria for Android applications
|
From: |
Ron Nazarov |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Criteria for Android applications |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:00:17 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 14:42 +0000, knowledgeofnations@outlook.com
wrote:
> So, for example, not promoting stuff like NewPipe (a YouTube client)
> and Aurora Store (a Google Play Store client)?
I think NewPipe would be allowed (as I don't think it runs any nonfree
software or promotes using nonfree software), but Aurora Store would
not be allowed, as it promotes apps in the Play Store (many of which
are nonfree).
Also, wouldn't Guix (and probably other FSDG-compliant distributions)
have the same issue with packaging pip and npm (Guix contains both)?
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Replicant] Criteria for Android applications, (continued)
Re: Criteria for Android applications, David Hedlund, 2021/08/20
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Criteria for Android applications, Jean Louis, 2021/08/21
Re: [Replicant] [GNU-linux-libre] Criteria for Android applications, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2021/08/22