denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo manual


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo manual
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 17:34:48 +0100

On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 18:02 +0900, Satoru Honda wrote:
> I'm very interested in denemo on raspberry pi .
> 
> >I was pleasantly surprised how easily it built, but, as you say
> Raspbian, like Ubuntu is a Debian derivative. 
> 
> Have you aleady write about this episode in detail on somewhere on
> internet?

No, I had no real purpose in building Denemo for Raspberry Pi, I was
just intrigued to see if it was easy to do. And apart from changing
guile-1.8 to guile-2.0 I could do it straight from the instructions on
denemo.org
But as I say, this showed up something strange: Portaudio couldn't find
the audio output - I'm used to having to specify where the audio output
should go on Unix systems, via the Preferences, but this time I
couldn't hear the output via any in-built audio interface. And, as I
say, even Portaudios basic test patest1.c didn't work. 

> 
> BTW I feel demeo software interface suitable for eye tracking
> control.
> Several months ago when I helped a course for the general public
> where techno musicians make music only with a smartphone at an art
> university, an ALS woman was interested in the class.
> She used to study the piano, and now she can move her hands, but it
> seems that most can not move.
> In that class, I used the sequencer program of the module synth
> tracker style of GUI called sunvox, but if the score can be read and
> written, it will not fit if the program that can be controlled by eye
> tracking can be built inexpensively  I was wondering.
> 
> Perhaps, if denemo can be used without problems with mouse-only or
> pen-table operations, I think it may be more compatible with eye
> tracking control.

That's interesting - I had to look up ALS and eye tracking control, so
you can tell it is not something I'm familiar with! Denemo started as
very keyboard-centric and has acquired mouse features only gradually.
It still doesn't do any of the new gesture stuff that touch-screens
have. And its MIDI output is quite primitive - intended for checking
the score is correct by listening for wrong notes/rhythms. LilyPond has
somewhat better MIDI output, which is what the Playback View uses.

Richard




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]