[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:24:20 +0000 |
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 14:34 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Richard Shann <address@hidden
> com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 12:42 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 12:34 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > I ran the executable on a Windows laptop under Vista. The first
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > However it gave this error message:
> > >
> > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > >
> > > Denemo - ?[0m: System wide denemo.scm
> > > F:\denemo\share\denemo\actions\denemo.scm
> > >
> > > Denemo - ?[0m:
> > > A script error for file/script
> > > F:\denemo\share\denemo\actions\denemo.scm; the throw arguments
> > are
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I see that libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so is on a list of libraries
> > not
> > "in the ia32-libs package" and have to be re-built for 64-bit.
> >
> > https://kb.mit.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=7767659
> >
> > So perhaps this is a clue. The laptops that I have access to with
> > Windows on them are 32-bit I suspect... Is your binary built for 64
> > or
> > 32 bit?
> >
> >
>
> My system is 64 bit. I have a libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.a and a
> libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.dll. On a windows system, why is it looking
> for a .so?
I don't think it is looking for a .so, the message just said
(dynamic-link file: ~S, message: ~S (libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3
without any suffix, the reference I gave to a problem with a missing
libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so file was in a page about a unix system,
but it could be that the problem is the same - to do with 32 versus 64
bit systems. I think I know someone with a 64-bit windows system
(windows 7 or 8 I think) that I could test on. Let me know if you have
something that it would be worthwhile testing on that. (At the moment
we are snowed in ...)
Richard
- [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Joe Wilkinson, 2018/02/13
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Richard Shann, 2018/02/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Jeremiah Benham, 2018/02/16
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Richard Shann, 2018/02/18
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Jeremiah Benham, 2018/02/19
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Richard Shann, 2018/02/20
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Richard Shann, 2018/02/22
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Richard Shann, 2018/02/22
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken, Jeremiah Benham, 2018/02/28
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Today's download: Tues 13 Feb appears to be broken,
Richard Shann <=