Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo/Lilypond beaming question

[Ellen Cooper]

Thank you, Richard.

So, I originally was using 2.0.12, but the same thing occurred when I moved to 2.0.13.  I also tried uninstall/reinstall, and rebooted computer.  Yes, I can reproduce the issue.  I've attached a small example that I just made.  One breve that is supposed to be d', and a longa that is supposed to be e'.

Oddly, when I tried this on a different computer last night, the denemo display visually moved the note down a fifth.  This morning, on a different computer, it moved it down a third.  

Ellen 

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 20:44 -0500, Ellen Cooper wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> So I've been testing out the early music notation capabilities of
> Lilypond/Denemo, and I'm still really green.  However, when I try to
> change note duration from, say, whole note to breve, it places the
> breve a 5th lower on the staff.  The Lilypond code says the note is as
> I entered it, and the typeset window does too.  It's just showing up
> odd in the main program's display.  Any thoughts?

It sounds like the Denemo Display has the wrong idea about the
prevailing clef - it thinks the prevailing clef is one which places the
note where you see it. That is, it knows the correct note, but has the
wrong value for the clef that it is displaying it in. To check if this
is the problem could you save & then re-load the piece. On re-loading it
Denemo re-calculates which clef is active for each measure and it will
then be correct.
To try and pin down the bug:
 I just took that Rebel piece that I did and changed a note from
whole-note to breve without anything bad happening in the display, so
the question is can you reproduce this bug at will? If so either
describe how you can do it step by step, or post a (small/compressed)
example.

Oh, and make sure you are using an up-to-date version of Denemo, of
course!

Richard

>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Ellen
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Ellen Cooper <address@hidden> wrote:
>         Great--thanks, Richard.  I'm looking forward to the new
>         build.
>
>
>         Nice coincidence in timing.  I've been exploring both Denemo
>         and Lilypond...trying to learn it/figure a way to build a
>         palette somehow. I'm quite interested in this but it's a
>         learning curve for sure.  I've coded only in R, and not in
>         several years.
>
>
>         The scores look lovely.  Thank you for sharing them!
>
>
>         Ellen
>
>         On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Richard Shann
>         <address@hidden> wrote:
>                 On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 20:29 +0100, Richard Shann
>                 wrote:
>                 > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 12:27 -0400, Ellen Cooper
>                 wrote:
>                 > > Thanks for any help!
>                 >
>                 > You didn't mention clefs and time signatures. I've
>                 put together an
>                 > example (attached) where I've inserted the LilyPond
>                 for these - I've
>                 > done all this rather crudely, just to illustrate
>                 some possibilities.
>                 > Only the time signature one did I resort to some
>                 low-level tinkering - I
>                 > started with the Numeric time signature command and
>                 edited it be a
>                 > mensural time signature command.
>                 >
>                 > If you think something along these lines would be
>                 useful we can create a
>                 > palette of these things...
>
>                 I *have* created a palette for mensural notation
>                 things - it will be in
>                 builds from 12th Oct.
>
>                 The story behind this is that when you wrote I
>                 happened to be
>                 transcribing a trio sonata that was printed using
>                 movable type,
>                 retaining many old petrucci style features. So I
>                 thought it would be fun
>                 to generate a "early" edition as well as the edition I
>                 was planning (one
>                 transposed up a minor third for treble recorders).
>                 Attached are the two
>                 versions - both printed from the same Denemo file.
>
>                 Richard
>
>                 >
>                 > Richard
>                 >
>                 >
>                 > _______________________________________________
>                 > Denemo-devel mailing list
>                 > address@hidden
>                 >
>                 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.gnu.org_mailman_listinfo_denemo-2Ddevel&d=CwICaQ&c=imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=NMGr03QGVOQpdZi1Ivz5Hg&m=QH7KfaBlCoPMZZzwWipNIcR5zWZiqHbfdYf3jeOB2AU&s=Do8L3V-wCwLmyRAz6h_8hlcflkEAC8ohKhhCp-UsqKY&e=
>
>
>
>
>
>         --
>
>         Ellen M. Cooper, Ph.D.
>         Superfund Research Center Analytical Chemistry Core Manager
>         Duke University NSOE
>         450 Research Drive, LSRC A150b (temporary)
>         Durham, NC  27708
>         (919) 613-8716
>         address@hidden
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ellen M. Cooper, Ph.D.
> Superfund Research Center Analytical Chemistry Core Manager
> Duke University NSOE
> 450 Research Drive, LSRC A150b (temporary)
> Durham, NC  27708
> (919) 613-8716
> address@hidden

--

Ellen M. Cooper, Ph.D.

Superfund Research Center Analytical Chemistry Core Manager

Duke University NSOE

450 Research Drive, LSRC A150b (temporary)

Durham, NC  27708

(919) 613-8716

address@hidden

breve_longa_issue.denemo
Description: Binary data