Re: [Denemo-devel] Import filter for CapXML

[Andreas Schneider]

Am 04.04.2015 um 17:13 schrieb Richard Shann:
> Another possibility would be to improve Denemo's musicXML import - the
> sort of trouble I see is things like time signature changes and double
> barlines getting repeated, and problems with upbeats (anacrusis...). I
> stopped working on it once it was importing the bulk data as the sort of
> score I import doesn't have much if any time signature changes (etc) and
> there is only one upbeat per movement (etc).
> Can you send me a problematic example of musicXML output from MuseScore?
> If it is bad output from MuseScore then directly importing Capella files
> might be a way to go as I guess Capella is storing information in an
> easier to read form than musicXML. It is easier to write bad musicXML
> than to try to read any sort of musicXML - did you try reading back the
> musicXML into MuseScore?

As you suggested, I re-imported the MusicXML into MuseScore, and it
looks like it's not much different from what Denemo gives -- apart from
several additional empty staffs that Denemo produces (in fact three for
each real staff). I'll send you the score per PM.

Andreas