Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 1.1

[Jeremiah Benham]

Ok. I have uploaded a 1.1.0 tarball. It compiled fine for me.

Jeremiah

On Nov 24, 2013 8:31 AM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden> wrote:

On Sun, 2013-11-24 at 15:07 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> Ok, I though keeping archives was important.
> This is done, the branch name is release-1.1.0
Great!
I have downloaded the release-1.1.0 branch and built it as a separate
user. It appears to be in working order - Jeremiah can you create the
candidate release tarball from this for sanity checking?

Richard



>
>
>
> 2013/11/24 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
>         On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 23:56 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote:
>         > A git tag points on one commit, no matter on which branch it
>         is
>         > (master or anything else).
>         >
>         > Branches to points to one commit, not a "set", but the
>         difference is
>         > that when you append a new commit, the branch points to the
>         newer
>         > commit.
>         >
>         > When you consider a commit, you also consider its parents,
>         that is
>         > what we feel we deal with "sets" of commits.
>         >
>         >
>         > Since you don't seem very cumfortable with tags: I can
>         propose you
>         > another workflow:
>
>
>         I suggest we make things much simpler: when we want to make a
>         release we
>         create a branch labelled stable-i.j.k as before, and when the
>         translations are in (and any fixes needed during testing) we
>         create the
>         final candidate tarball. Once this is tested we upload to
>         ftp.gnu.org
>         and announce the release. Then we delete the branch.
>
>         The reasoning is simple: we are not a library that needs to
>         maintain
>         more than one version. We will never issue a release based on
>         an old
>         release rather than based on master. And, this is a process we
>         already
>         know how to do - we are severely short of resource for doing
>         infrastructure.
>
>         (Of course, we can transform the release branch into a tag if
>         folk
>         prefer and someone knows how ...)
>
>         If this is acceptable could someone who knows how create the
>         branch
>         stable-1.1.0 so that we can start testing.
>
>         Richard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>
> « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
>